Thursday, January 16, 2014

1 Nenokkadine – Unanswered Questions!!

After seeing so many people, including film directors, showering praises on 1 Nenokkadine, I have thought of getting answers to few questions that puts me back in calling this film a marvel. Firstly, I admire the great director Sukumar, so that reflected in my rating of 2.5/5 for 1 Nenokkadine. I couldn’t digest the fact that ‘Master story-teller’ and ‘Master of detail’ Sukumar has left few loose ends in the film.

Few people told me that I was generous in my rating and the movie only deserved a 1/5 or 1.5/5, and some said how you can like a movie where the entertainment factor is zilch. I don’t want to discuss about them as their definition of entertainment is definitely flawed. My concern is those people who called film critics as useless and baseless. Some even used extreme language and labeled us as ones who don’t understand the nuances of cinema. I take that statement with a pinch of salt. If someone can suggest a good course in 'film criticism' or 'review writing', I will enroll for it.



Here’s the link to my review


Alongside praising the film, I wrote few lines bringing out the negatives of the film. As every review of mine, I wanted to keep this spoiler-free, so didn’t want to get into the details at the time of writing it.

My questions are as follows:

1) When the news of rockstar Gautham (Mahesh Babu) broke on the TV, it has alerted Nasser living in London but not Kelly Dorji in Goa. During the entire stretch of the first half, Kelly (The industrialist) tries to kill Sameera (Kriti Sanon) but not Gautham. When Nasser has a close aide and partner in crime staying in India, why would he and his team try to contact Gautham. The same job could have been delegated to Kelly.

2) Why Nasser needs to create a set-up of some small company and carve wooden statuettes in Pune. I know this is to shift the focus of audience from his character but isn’t it fooling them. He is an industrialist and can stay in some hotel and oversee the operation. Nasser coming to India is again baseless. If my first question is valid then it can be done by Kelly himself.

3) In the yacht and fire episode, what’s the need for parasailing? Gautham can take Sameera to the boat and I don’t know how the parachute opened up after traveling such a small distance? After they accidentally reach an island, Gautham finds Sameera’s camera lying on the beach. Now don’t say that skimpily-clad Sameera brought it from the yacht.


4) Kelly paints all his murders as accidents. Then after a futile attempt to kill Sameera in Goa, why did he plan to attack her in Hyderabad. He should have created an accident to kill her. It’s shown that he also has a local gang in Hyderabad, so what’s the need to send his henchmen all the way from Goa (they also kill a police officer at the check post – why all this?). In the fight that follows, the goons get multiple chances to kill Sameera but they wait for Gautham to hit them and fight with them. That really suspended my disbelief. Hence, I wrote this in my review “There are few staples that are typical of a Telugu film and some of them gleam so much that you scratch your head in disbelief.” When you are making a thriller that’s touted to be on par with Hollywood standards, please stay with it and avoid force-fit commercial elements.

5) In the song London Babu, Gautham is seen dancing with Sophia to get a key and opens a locker and sends an SMS to Michael. Why? Anyways he would be coming there, right. The director felt that the song is needed to drive some story. However, it’s unwarranted and stands as a sore thumb.


6) In the pre-climax, Nasser says he and Gautham’s father used to work as co-scientists in a company and later parted their ways. However, in the climax, Gautham says his father was not a biologist / farmer / scientist. Now isn’t it a contradiction?

7) The director piles another layer of disbelief when he shows that streets of Belfast don’t change even after 20 years. And Gautham’s house still exists with his belongings.

8) In the interval bang, Gautham fires a bullet, which no one hears but the heroine. She reaches him and after confirming that he shot Kelly for real, he fires few more bullets. Surprisingly, no one, including Sameera's boss, hear these gun shots. Later, they take his body to a forest and throw it into a well. How did this happen without the notice of anyone?

9) Now coming to the famous ‘plant-and-payoff’ Rubik’s cube and its clues. It’s simple and understandable that whenever Gautham finishes the cube he leaves four different color cubes in the middle. Yes, his father knows this and writes the clue on it. This is beyond the comprehension of the villain. But when Gautham looks at the cube in a flashback-intercut-real-time-scene in the second half, he sees the storage bank’s logo on one of its faces, which is a yellow square inside a green square. The objective is to make him recognize the logo, then what’s the point in showing his (dis)ability to arrange the cube right. Another million dollar question – the pass code consists of 8 characters written on four faces of the cube. How does Gautham know the correct sequence – clockwise or counter clockwise? In the film, he is shown turning the cube counter clockwise. What if he does it other way around?!


1 Nenokkadine is a valiant attempt by Sukumar to blur the difference between mainstream cinema and art house classics. However, some masala staples and unanswered questions made it unpalatable. That’s not all. Few moments add a new leaf to ‘Suspension of Disbelief’.  

I am waiting for the answers..!!

51 comments:

  1. @!,2 Nasser might be wanting the golden rice for himself, and so he followed gautham without kelly.

    @6. Gautham by saying "not a biologist/scientist" meant that....his father is a man with some goal to help farmers by giving some permanant solution and working to achieve it, and he actually doesnt mean that his father was not a scientist!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Answer to 1 sounds valid but why was Kelly immune to all the news of Gautham killling him and other two. Along with Sameera, he should have also planned to kill Gautham.

      Answer to 6: That's understood. But what's the need to contradict Nasser's statement that he was a co-scientist with Gautham's father. Shall I take it as 'not true'.

      Delete
  2. 1. Nasser sees Mahesh killing Pradeep ravath, but donno who Mahesh is until he knows the news.. He might have traced back to past with this info. But Nasser needs Mahesh to solve puzzle to get magic rice. So he himself comes as taxi driver to give them to him and at the same time to prevent Mahesh from killing him creating a soft corner. If Kelly Dorji's team would have tried to contact Mahesh it would have been a huge mess but at same time cannot prevent Mahesh from killing Nasser. Its a smart move from Nasser.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a nice explanation bro... Which means Nasser and Kelly are working together and the former might have asked to let it go, so as to handle it by himself. But Kelly would have sent some one to befriend Gautham and get to the secret. So many inferences can be drawn from this scene,

      Delete
    2. You seem hell bent on nit picking all these trivial details, while there is a magnificently crafted larger arc being portrayed on screen. Is it your opinion that all of the Hollywood suspense thrillers have a super tight script and no gaping plot holes. Well, get a reality check 'duduuu'. The movie '1 Nenokkadine' is not just a suspense thriller in its entirety, it is an excellent showpiece at blending Indian Formulaic movie making and Hollywood style dramatic structure. Too bad that you have wasted your energies by dangling on to those silly details. Seems U really hate Mahesh Babu, not the kind of star who would simply settle for doing age old histrionics and churning out movies that takes believability for a ride.

      Delete
  3. 2. Nasser wants to show that he is a taxi driver.. Who used to carve wood as a hobby.. Who kept two wooden carved dolls at his parents' graves. Wood carving here is a needless to movie anyway.. but director tried to put it in movie and at the same time justified it

    3. Spare this. Camera is needed in next scene. No justification but its the tollywood's way of putting things in place. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually Pradeep Rawat places the wooden dolls near the grave of Gautham's parents. So their presence in both the flashback episodes (Nasser and Pradeep as driver) was justified. However, Nasser setting things up in Pune is too fool the audience. This is still not justified. Is it playing safe by not making Gautham suspicious or gain some sympathy from him?

      Delete
    2. @Srikanth Shah

      For 3) Had close look when i saw for the second time. When Samira gets unconscious at the beach and at the couch, she is shown carring her bag. So obviously her bag also travlled along with her till island. Take a bow Sukumar! I see that Sukumar did not leave any loop hole for almost all the questions raised here !!

      Delete
  4. All the answers in this link.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=681432351879292&set=a.127607900595076.14401.100000376009896&type=1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks a ton Vamsi Suman.

      U r the one who gave the most believable (close to logic) answers, though some of them fall in the zone of 'may be' or 'may be not'. Coming to the climax and whether it's shot in London or Belfast, it's Geography and nothing to do with film criticism. I might have missed a point there, but still how can you be so sure that Nasser is based in Belfast and not London. Nasser met Pradeep outside the concert and they traveled together. Is there any vital link that connects Nasser and his company to Belfast??!

      Delete
    2. Excellent replies Vamsi Suman

      @Raja Satish, If you see Trivias and FAQs for some english movies in IMDB, there will be few such may be or may be not answers for the loopholes. Reason, you cannot get the full book scenes into the movie. Further, Critics there does not end up giving 2.5 or 5* rating due to these loopholes but publicise such 1derful movies with 4 or 4.5* looking at the overall impact/unique concept. That is where our critics have failed. You are atleast ciritcal but few critics thrashed the movie just by seeing the audience response on benefit shows/1st day.

      Another feedback for you...you said you missed the points as you have seen the movie amidst fans noises in the benefit show! You missed the points but quickly rated it as 2.5 without re-checking in normal shows!!

      Critics and their reviews have defnitely spoiled the prospects of the movie. Agree or Disagree, telugus watch movies based on talk and critics reviews!! what are the consequences of 1 failure nd yevadu hit? A superb director like Deva Katta included an atrocious song on brahmanandam in a concept based movie - AutoNagar Surya..RIP TFI

      Delete
    3. Thanks Aryaman for all the lovely feedback.

      //looking at the overall impact/unique concept//

      The concept is unique one in TFI and If we look at the overall impact, it's again debatable. Most of the people failed to grab the essence of the film, and some even lost the connect midway. To be an effective communicator / storyteller, I need to ensure that my message seeps into the minds of audience. So, here, though the director pushed the envelope to bring in a new form of entertainment, it was so heavy on a regular viewer. As you know, the film-makers had to explain the film's crux to audience in the press meets and other interviews, and chop 20 minutes from the film. Why they have to resort to such a thing. It is clear that there was a futile attempt to convey their point in one medium.

      How much a critic influences a film's success??

      Trade reports say that critics and their reviews influence a small share of a film's revenue. I may be right or wrong, but the influence is minimum. But in case of Bollywood, the reviews fall on both the ends of the spectrum. Some give it a 1, and some give it a 4. Most of the critics write-off certain movies, and they still cross the 100 crore mark.

      I said I missed some point on Geography in the benefit show. About ANS and addition of an item song; that's bringing a formula in a non-formulaic ecosystem and a reflection of the status quo of TFI. You have plug in something to woo the masses.

      Delete
    4. @Raja Satish

      Audience lost the connect midway!! Yes but not everyone, Critics should not. I lost the connect midway when i have seen Inception but critics there did not!! Yes Director pushed the envelope to bring new form of entertainment to a wrond audience who are used to Dookudu/AD/Racha templates. Unfortunately, Critics here also got used to it. I think that is the whole criticims of telugu critics. A 2nd half of Attarintiki Daredhi is accepted by all critics that its rediculous but ends up with 3-4.5* becuase AUDIENCE GOT CONNECTED!! I considered Lunchbox movie as boring but critics there did not go with the audience reaction! Yes Film-maker had to chop off and explain film`s crux in press meets as he made the movie for TELUGU AUDIENCE! Pity Sukumar, he would not have faced this wrath had this been in any other industry!

      Please dont campare Tollywood reviews with Bollywood. The reviews thare does not effect on the overall revenue. Hindi has wide markets. Rediculous mvs with super bad talk with varying critics review ratings (Krish3 and Dhoom3) were top grossers there. They will not work in Telugu if they got same talk and same varying critics review ratings

      Addition of item song/formula!! Are there any producers here who dare to make big budget non-formulaic mv with no mass trappings!

      Delete
    5. @Vamsi suman -
      asal ne baadentra?cinema baagledani audience phone lo chapte **neeku psycological problem undi** ani titte director ni support cheyyala? 70crores, 1.5yrs movie teesina director ni support cheyyala? kothaga chesnapdu correct planning,low budget heyalra,cinema review baaga rayaledani critics ni nuvvemo tidthava? entra ne sketch?first audience and critics ki respect ivvadam nerchukondi. nuvvu nee kullu logics.neek critics istam lekunte chupchap anni moo--ni kurcho. ee video chhodra faalthu ga-

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EzCFCTreC8

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. @Vamsi Suman -
      orey jeffa, gippude nee short movie **VIRUS** joosna.Navvi navvi kadupu
      nachhindra. deeniki VIRUS kaadra **PSYCHO MARADALU** ani title undalra.

      Friends, meerandaru ee short movie choosi tarinchadi.meeru kooda psycholu aithe ilanti psycho directors ni encourage cheyyandi.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SD7lqSQyhqc

      Delete
    8. @Vamsi Suman -
      nee psycho short film ku free publicity ichinandku naku thanks cheppodura. nuv next generation sukumar anukuntuva? nee poster meeda critics ki warning print cheyra
      ** naa cinema ki ratings takuvisthe lepestha ani*** Lmao.

      ne next movie ki **PSYCHO BAVA** ani title pettra.first part lo maradalu banda tho kottindi kada gippudu veedu psycho aiyyi movie directorni,ante ninne, dammad dammad inko pedda bandatho kodthadanta.idi story.ippudelli direct chesko. Jeffa

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. @Satish Reddy

      Just because @Vamsi Suman supported the movie and director, you dont have to pull out all the negative aspects and present it here, shows your cheap PSYCHO mentality!!

      Yes isn`t it psycho behavior for people to go on first benefit show and then psychoticlaly try for the varadhi call to be the first caller and convey the negative points there to director? A normal person would end up calling rigourously to speak to his/her favorite director/actor to convey positive points and if possible, highlight some negative points to take care of.
      Sukumar behaved that way irritated with the behavior of this ANTI FAN(s) and knows its not a genuine opinion! Someone even reported that there are 40-50 fake tiwtter ids created on day of #1Nenokkadine released giving same spam tweets about how bad the movie is(courtesy Anti Fans)

      Kudos to Sukumar for acknowleging his mistake, about y he reponded that way and saying sorry to the caller later. Very few genuine prople have the habit of realizing their mistakes!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh6NB4SyM3Y

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    12. @Raja Satish
      You have missed the geography details as you have watched the movie during benefit show. You might have figured out above loopholes also due to the benefit show view and have agreed to @Vamsi Suman that the most of the answers are believable and close to logic.

      Now that you have agreed there are no/very few loopholes, would you also agree that the critics here have not good job reviwing this movie? Would you like re-watch and re-review the movie?

      Delete
    13. @aryaman
      behave lyk normal man. you are talking as a PSYCHO MAN.

      okasari audience ni titti taruvaata sorry ani oka pedda director chapthe adi neeku nachinda?ante okadu baagledu ante evvaru chhodra?krish3 ni all reviewers baagledannar aina 300crs vachindi.audience nachuthe velthar,critics reviews choosi kadu.inka nuvvu critics ni torture chesi,reviews maarchamani adithunnav ante inka nuvvu maarav ra. mee andariki yevadu collections baagunnay ani kullu be.

      neela critics ni titte dedhdimag galla kosame ee article raasaru,jara intha chadvuko:
      http://telugu.greatandhra.com/articles/special-articles/one-way-lo-accident-enduku-ayyindi-49749.htm

      Delete
    14. @aryaman alias PSYCHOMAN,

      @Vamsi suman friend okadu "dhoom3 is pure shit compared to 1" ani post chesadu. 500cr collections chesina movie shit anna vaadini ee paagal Vamsi gadu support chesaadu.

      ante meeru vere movie ni "shit" anachha? critics 1 movie ku takkuva rating isthe vaadini tidataara? mind dobbindaara meeku?

      nenu amirkhan fan ra. nenu gippudu chepthanda "1 is shit before dhoom3". vaadu correct aithe nenu correcte ra. Samaj ayyinda faalthu.

      Delete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    16. @aryaman... Hey, if you see one of my earlier comments, I have said.... though some of them fall in the zone of 'may be' or 'may be not'..... Except for the Geography thing, the other responses, though logical, fall in that territory. Yes, I have watched the film again, and alongside getting answers my questions kitty also increased by a couple.

      I too gave low ratings to some Hindi movies - The Lunchbox - 2.5, Krrish 3 - 2, Ramleela - 2. Then people started labeling that Tollywood critics have no sensibilities to appreciate a Hindi film. I don't know how was that a justifiable statement. As a critic, we voice our opinion, irrespective of a Telugu, Hindi or English landscape. A film is a film and every film critic steps into shoes of an audience and then dons the hat of a critic. Some try to do a balancing act and some stay on extreme poles.

      Few say that 1 - Nenokkadine is a right film in a wrong industry. But why? When we have accepted many art house classics that are away from formula, then why not 1??

      Delete
    17. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    18. @Raja Satish

      Well..if we put it other way, why only people have raised voice against critics ratings of 1 and why not other mvs which ended up with low ratings? Its pointless if we just ignore thinking that it is created by mahesh fans or makers. Many of my frends who are other hero fans, who absolutely hate mahesh and sukumar;just loved the movie and are surprised by the talk and critics ratings.

      We are talking about telugu movie reviews and not hindi movies here. Art house classics? Name one done by a telugu big star in the recent 5-10 years! Clearly acceptance of 1 by critics, eventually public woudl ahve started new revolution in the way telugu scripts are today.

      Critics say that it is their opinion and expect people to respect and accept it. Well, people also have given some opinion and critics now feel offended. Critics dont respect people`s opinion but expect people to accept their opinion.

      People really got into opinion about telugu critics when they see excellent positive reviews coming in for 1 from other industries! Mark this space, you will see more such reviews pouring from other industries.

      why are we raising our voice? The other industry critics first reaction is- we never dreamt we will watch a telugu movie and appreciate it but 1 did that. This is something very annoying that telugu critics have thrashed a golden and innovate attempt.

      You ahve been so nitpicking holes to rate it low for 1 movie! You(many critics) never did it for Attarintiki Daredi. you never rated it low pointing out gravity defying stunts with Sun glasses, Station clearance, Pawan slipping off the character and asks his men even to kill people if they dont clear station, Amnesia on/off for heroine, Trivikram blantant inspirations from A thousand words, Assassins(Athdu)/Dark knigt(Julayi fight). Critics have hailed it with 4* but nitpicks loops in 1 to rate it low!! Show these template movies like AD, Dookudu, baadhsah, Racha to other industry people. They(mostly) will comment out saying telugu movies are rediculous.

      Every one perfects working positivley on some aspects of criticism but unfortunately our (some) critics does not feel like taking feedback and circulate self ego boost articles pointing at peoples opinion! (GA article). what is the consequences of this?
      1. Devakatta added rediculous song on brahmi for ANS
      2. Mahesh back to Dookud/Pokiri/family entertainer templates
      3. Sukumar will be back to his love stories
      4. charan to yevadu/family entertainer templates

      we request critics not put down our heroes/directors/makers saying they never try new . Critics always do that when they review very good kolly/bolly movies.

      Please take feedback if you think its relevant. Else, please ignore and all the best!

      Delete
  5. Dude.. Your no 6 is absolutely ridiculous. Goutham says my father isn't a scientist/farmer or a biologist and then continues his speech saying his father's heart ached to see lotsa people suffer and this triggered him to be a scientist. Apparently you are not taking it according to the context. The use of such lines is sheer brilliance where you propose a negative statement and then contradict it by your logic. Read Antony's speech in Shakespeare's Julius Caeser to appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude... I am not saying anything against what Gautham said. That point is taken. Nasser and Gautham's father are colleagues in a firm. Then the latter moves out and starts cultivation of rice in a traditional way and for that Nasser says it's impossible. If he is already into something then why Gautham's father worked as a scientist. Why ridiculous?? What shall the audience think.

      Delete
  6. Raja satish ... you keep criticizing and writing blogs on the internet ... plz continue doing that ... because anyway you're not that creative to make a movie or write a story ... never in your life you stood behind a camera ... this is what you can do ... hmmm ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Raja... I have not been so critical on the film. If you notice, in my review, I have showered praises on the film's FORM and TECHNIQUE. This post is to get clarity on few unanswered questions, at least for me, from the film. Many people are still confused about most of the parts of the film. May be I am trying to echo them. Above all, I couldn't stomach few loose ends coming from an able director. That's all.

      Now, I am more than happy that I got answers to most of the questions. Well, coming to the point that whether I can make a movie or write a story. Isn't it probing too much into my personal space.

      Delete
  7. When Nasar narrates fake flashback to Mahesh ... he said that he want to settle in London as taxi driver and seeks help from pradeep rawat and also Pradeep Rawat and Kelly narrates that Nasar has accepted help from them ...then why he becomes taxi firm owner in India.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gautham should have got the doubt when he visited Nasser. But again, there was no concrete point to say that the taxi driver might have settled in London. May be after the killing of Gautham's parents, he might have not asked for their help.

      Delete
    2. Pradeep Rawat asks Nazar that he is looiking out to settle in Lodon and trying out for Visa. when nazar tells theat people asks life or money to not to disclose their secrets, he gives a wicked smile along with pradeep rawat saying "mari nuvvu, Vissa". So it makes sense taxi driver settled in london.

      Delete
  8. It's a brave attempt by Sukumar. It's soo sad to digest that, so called critics are not appreciating brilliant screenplay and trying to pick silly loop holes to conclude this movie as disaster. For you critics, you like movies like Yevadu etc etc, go on....mana industry inka bagupadadu

    ReplyDelete
  9. Some of these questions are silly, seriously. If there is an ambiguity you can question, you are even questioning the way director showed some scenes on screen, that's his creativity. Why can't a parachute take off immediately? you are expecting the streets of a city to change in 20 years, come Hyderabad I will show hell lot of streets which haven't changed. And your logic on Rubik's cube is meaningless. You are trying to save face for your pathetic review. This movie has opened reviewers eyes, a welcome change. Anybody who opens a website has become a reviewer unfortunately and they are deciding the fate of the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  10. As for #7. There are several towns in US (not sure about Europe) called "Ghost Towns" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_town) where places are intact for years. I myself visited few places but never been inside a house. But I believe the belongings whatever were left would've stayed.

    ReplyDelete
  11. #9 is purely based on an algorithm for solving Rubik's cube (also called Rubik's revenge). Gautham when he was a kid infact doesnt finish solving the cube and leaves it at step 1 which is - solving for centers. (http://vwscreation.blogspot.com/2013/10/how-to-solve-4x4-cuberevenge_17.html)

    It maybe that the father was trying to teach him Rubik's revenge but he always stopped at step 1. This can only be precisely answered by Sukumar himself

    ReplyDelete
  12. #3, lol, is where me and my girlfriend looked at each other in disbelief for the same exact reason as you mentioned. But then again if you ask such questions I would aptly tell you - "Kallu potai alantivi adigavante, lempalesko"

    ReplyDelete
  13. Last but not the least, please check out this website me and my friends created exclusively for telugu film lovers: http://hummingtown.com

    We also have an articles section where people like you write their views: http://hummingtown.com/fan_articles

    Kindly promote us and keep writing there as well so people on Humming Town can read them too :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Here are my answers to the critic.
    1) In the flashback, Nasser, being an NRI, took the help of Kelly Dorjee, a Goa local, to help him in finishing off Gautham's parents. Kelly didn't know the purpose of the kill, and didn't know what Gautham's father was upto. Moreover, Sukumar cleverly linked Kelly and Nasser's paths. The reason why Nasser, a seed scientist, contacted Kelly was that he was into the seed business (as established in the scene where Sameera reports about the HCN in the seeds produced by Kelly's firm)

    ReplyDelete
  15. 2) Nasser came to know about Gautham and his past, when he spoke to Pradeep Rawat, after chasing him during his concert at Belfast, Ireland. But, Gautham remembers only the faces of the three persons, and nothing else about them. Hence, he recognized Rawat. Nasser observed this in Belfast. (Notice that he is based at Belfast, not London). So, he cleverly decided to trick Gautham into believing his made up story (using the vague details Gautham remembers) and got into the character of the cab driver who assisted the culprits, through which he wanted Gautham to solve the clue. Hence, Kelly at this point was nowhere related to Nasser or his activities in 2013 (real-time)

    ReplyDelete
  16. 3) The reason for the parasailing is very elementary. Sameera was unconscious and could'nt have held on to anything to prevent her from falling off the scooter, considering it was a very bumpy ride. If Mahesh tied her to his back, that would make it difficult for him to ride the scooter, and also limit his mobility, considering that there where shots being fired. This is a brilliant logic actually.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 4) The goons could've probably taken her somewhere, killed her and projected the murder as accident, as always with Kelly's victims. They were trying to take her away, and to avoid Gautham from attacking them, they put a knife on her throat. Out of all the countless Telugu movies, you chose to ignore 'suspension of disbelief' in this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 5) I won't argue with this point, because basically, there is no scope for an item song in any movie, leave alone 1. The reason is contrived.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 6) In Gautham's monologue in the last scene, he says that his father wasn't all those things initially, but his zeal and passion made him a biologist and a farmer. It is not uncommon for someone to change his/her career path midway.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 7) Your question made me cringe.The whole climax was set in and around Belfast, Ireland. Pradeep Rawat's son brings Mahesh to the spot where his father, Rawat was killed. This place is Belfast, as established in my answer to question 2. For more clarity, the murder of Rawat was shown with a superscript which read 'Belfast, Northern Ireland'. As said in point 2, Nasser is based in Belfast too. His company is located there. So, the entire climax took place in Belfast.
    And, also how could you assume a place which had a sea-shore (in the walkway wooden bridge shot) to be London? Considering that Belfast is a town and the house was secluded from the mainland, it's possible that the house remained unoccupied.And, Sukumar showed the difference in vegetation in the shot where 'Trees ki madhyalo road undi' line comes.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 8) Gautham's father engraved that clue on the cube, because Gautham solved it in that pattern due to habit, not due to any disorder. And his was Integration Disorder, not dyslexia or something else, to make him unable solve the cube completely. It's out of his habit that the grown-up rockstar Gautham solves the cube in that pattern. Regarding the passcode thing, it wasn't an 8 character code. It had 9 characters. N3-PC-181-KZ. Since, you nitpicked this point, I'll offer a possible explanation.The passcode might be in some specific pattern, (like the characters 5-7 being always numeric). Or else, Gautham's dad might have added an extra clue for the order in which the passcode had to be read. This is a far-fetched explanation, I agree, but it's not completely illogical. As Sherlock said, 'Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
    All other points are fine, they are geniune doubts, but the question where you assumed that the climax was set in London sums up the state of the critics in TFI. I won't say anything else. It's clear who is doing a ' half-baked' job now. It's definitely not Sukumar!
    Sorry, if I was rude, but it's my angst against all the critics, who couldn't understand the brilliance of this great movie which could've opened new frontiers in TFI, and trashed it left and right. Now, no '1' in TFI will dare to experiment on a huge budget again.

    ReplyDelete
  23. why michael will be killed in the movie? and who kills him...Nasser? can anyone please answer this.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Check the complete analysis of the movie here

    ReplyDelete